Billionaire Elon Musk has announced that his tenure as a formal adviser to President Donald Trump is coming to an end, raising questions about the future of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative he led.
In a post on X, his social media platform, Musk expressed gratitude to Trump for the opportunity to address government spending inefficiencies.
“As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President @realDonaldTrump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending,” Musk posted on X. “The @DOGE mission will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government.”
Here are the five primary reasons why Musk may have stepped down from his advisory position:
Scheduled end of term
The most straightforward explanation lies in the statutory limitations of Musk's role as a Special Government Employee. These positions are legally restricted to 130 days of service within a 365-day period, with Musk's term scheduled to conclude around late May 2025. This arrangement was always intended to be temporary and advisory in nature, rather than a permanent executive position with direct decision-making authority. The position's inherent time constraints made this transition inevitable, regardless of other factors.
The ' Big Beautiful Bill '
A significant catalyst for Musk's departure appears to be his public opposition to Trump's signature legislation.
Just one day before his announcement, Musk openly criticised what the president dubbed his "big beautiful bill," describing it as a "massive spending bill" that would expand the federal deficit.
Also Read | Elon Musk to exit US government role after criticising Trump's 'big beautiful bill': 10 things to know
This legislation, combining tax cuts with enhanced immigration enforcement measures, stood in direct opposition to DOGE's core mission of reducing government spending and waste. During a CBS interview, Musk pointedly remarked, "I think a bill can be big or it could be beautiful, but I don't know if it could be both." This fundamental disagreement over fiscal policy created an untenable situation for his continued advisory role.
While speaking to CBS, Musk described it as a “massive spending bill” that increases the federal deficit and “undermines the work” of DOGE.
Frustration with bureaucratic inertia
Musk's experience with federal bureaucracy proved far more challenging than he initially anticipated. In various public statements, he expressed growing frustration with the pace of change and institutional resistance within Washington.
Speaking to the Washington Post, Musk described the situation as "much worse than I realized" and characterised his reform efforts as an "uphill battle."
The challenges extended beyond mere administrative hurdles, as DOGE became a lightning rod for criticism, often being blamed for various government-related issues, even those outside its purview. This mounting pressure affected not only the initiative but also Musk's other business ventures, with some protesters even targeting Tesla vehicles.
Limited success in achieving spending cuts
The gap between DOGE's ambitious targets and actual achievements likely contributed to Musk's decision.
Initially promising $2 trillion in savings, the target was subsequently revised downward to $1 trillion, and then further to $150 billion. While DOGE implemented aggressive budget cuts and workforce reductions, the results fell significantly short of original expectations.
The department aimed to reduce the civilian workforce by 12% (approximately 288,000 positions from the 2.4 million total), but achieved only about 100,000 reductions through buyouts and terminations - a figure lower than typical annual retirement numbers. The DOGE website's reported savings of $175 billion, while substantial, represented just a fraction of the initial goals.
Rededicating focus to core companies
Musk's decision also reflects a strategic pivot back to his corporate interests, particularly Tesla, which has faced recent challenges in sales and profitability. During a Tesla earnings call, Musk announced plans to significantly reduce his time commitment to DOGE starting in May, indicating his intention to dedicate more attention to his business ventures.
This shift comes as Tesla navigates through declining profits and revenues, complicated by political uncertainties and tariff concerns. The company has also faced challenges related to Musk's political involvement, with some consumers and activists targeting Tesla in response to his government role.
Throughout his tenure, Musk maintained that his position as "chief nothing officer" was not essential to DOGE's mission. However, his departure raises questions about the initiative's future direction and effectiveness.
In a post on X, his social media platform, Musk expressed gratitude to Trump for the opportunity to address government spending inefficiencies.
“As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President @realDonaldTrump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending,” Musk posted on X. “The @DOGE mission will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government.”
As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President @realDonaldTrump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 29, 2025
The @DOGE mission will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government.
Here are the five primary reasons why Musk may have stepped down from his advisory position:
Scheduled end of term
The most straightforward explanation lies in the statutory limitations of Musk's role as a Special Government Employee. These positions are legally restricted to 130 days of service within a 365-day period, with Musk's term scheduled to conclude around late May 2025. This arrangement was always intended to be temporary and advisory in nature, rather than a permanent executive position with direct decision-making authority. The position's inherent time constraints made this transition inevitable, regardless of other factors.
The ' Big Beautiful Bill '
A significant catalyst for Musk's departure appears to be his public opposition to Trump's signature legislation.
Just one day before his announcement, Musk openly criticised what the president dubbed his "big beautiful bill," describing it as a "massive spending bill" that would expand the federal deficit.
Also Read | Elon Musk to exit US government role after criticising Trump's 'big beautiful bill': 10 things to know
This legislation, combining tax cuts with enhanced immigration enforcement measures, stood in direct opposition to DOGE's core mission of reducing government spending and waste. During a CBS interview, Musk pointedly remarked, "I think a bill can be big or it could be beautiful, but I don't know if it could be both." This fundamental disagreement over fiscal policy created an untenable situation for his continued advisory role.
While speaking to CBS, Musk described it as a “massive spending bill” that increases the federal deficit and “undermines the work” of DOGE.
Frustration with bureaucratic inertia
Musk's experience with federal bureaucracy proved far more challenging than he initially anticipated. In various public statements, he expressed growing frustration with the pace of change and institutional resistance within Washington.
Speaking to the Washington Post, Musk described the situation as "much worse than I realized" and characterised his reform efforts as an "uphill battle."
The challenges extended beyond mere administrative hurdles, as DOGE became a lightning rod for criticism, often being blamed for various government-related issues, even those outside its purview. This mounting pressure affected not only the initiative but also Musk's other business ventures, with some protesters even targeting Tesla vehicles.
Limited success in achieving spending cuts
The gap between DOGE's ambitious targets and actual achievements likely contributed to Musk's decision.
Initially promising $2 trillion in savings, the target was subsequently revised downward to $1 trillion, and then further to $150 billion. While DOGE implemented aggressive budget cuts and workforce reductions, the results fell significantly short of original expectations.
The department aimed to reduce the civilian workforce by 12% (approximately 288,000 positions from the 2.4 million total), but achieved only about 100,000 reductions through buyouts and terminations - a figure lower than typical annual retirement numbers. The DOGE website's reported savings of $175 billion, while substantial, represented just a fraction of the initial goals.
Rededicating focus to core companies
Musk's decision also reflects a strategic pivot back to his corporate interests, particularly Tesla, which has faced recent challenges in sales and profitability. During a Tesla earnings call, Musk announced plans to significantly reduce his time commitment to DOGE starting in May, indicating his intention to dedicate more attention to his business ventures.
This shift comes as Tesla navigates through declining profits and revenues, complicated by political uncertainties and tariff concerns. The company has also faced challenges related to Musk's political involvement, with some consumers and activists targeting Tesla in response to his government role.
Throughout his tenure, Musk maintained that his position as "chief nothing officer" was not essential to DOGE's mission. However, his departure raises questions about the initiative's future direction and effectiveness.
You may also like
A PIO physician treats Harvard grads to life lessons
Bristol jail horror as 'prisoner officer stabbed' at HMP Long Lartin
Are you happy disposable vapes are being banned? Take our poll and have your say
Indian-American undergrad Megha Vemuri from MIT torches alma mater and Israel at graduation ceremony
Ryan Reynolds overruled on Wrexham pre-season plan as star reveals who has the real power
